Reviews TP-LINK TL-WR840N
Reviews TP-LINK TL-WR840N
Interested in reviews of TP-LINK TL-WR840N? It got 4.8 out of 5 stars from our customers. Find specific customer reviews of TP-LINK TL-WR840N below. We will appreciate if you also share your experiences with TP-LINK TL-WR840N after purchasing.
User Reviews
Martina, Bratislava
Rated 29/01/2018, variant TP-LINK TL-WR840N
Verified purchase
quick and easy configuration
cost-effective
good design
according to the manual I have several LEDs lit, only one is lit - I do not know if it is a bug or a bad instruction, but it is not a problem in use
0 ×Report
Rudolf, Bratislava
Rated 30/12/2017, variant TP-LINK TL-WR840N
Verified purchase
Good price and better range than the previous router.
I have not had a bad experience with the goods.
0 ×Report
Milan, Pardubice
Rated 10/11/2017, variant TP-LINK TL-WR840N
Verified purchase
Seamless connection
0 ×Report
Bohumil, Žďár nad Sázavou
Rated 06/11/2017, variant TP-LINK TL-WR840N
Verified purchase
design
friendly router menu
none
0 ×Report
Jana, Praha 6 - Řepy
Rated 19/09/2017, variant TP-LINK TL-WR840N
Verified purchase
nice look
easy installation - even a beginner can handle it
price/performance ratio - covers well a 3+1 apartment
0 ×Report
Miroslav, Praha
Rated 15/09/2017, variant TP-LINK TL-WR840N
Verified purchase
Perfectly sufficient for my use and at a good price.
0 ×Report
Martin, Velký Osek
Rated 03/09/2017, variant TP-LINK TL-WR840N
Verified purchase
works
Then it has 2 antennas. so it has poor coverage
not in cz
the cheaper model from netis is better
0 ×Report
Tomáš, Golianovo
Rated 18/05/2017, variant TP-LINK TL-WR840N
Verified purchase
Nice, reliable, goes, easy to set up without reading the manual, like fine
But for my taste very weak signal range, as if far apart will not let you: )
0 ×Report
Martin, Hovězí
Rated 21/02/2017, variant TP-LINK TL-WR840N
Verified purchase
Cheap
somehow does not work as I expected
0 ×Report
Vladimír, Volárna
Rated 14/01/2017, variant TP-LINK TL-WR840N
Verified purchase
Good range
Nothing yet.
0 ×Report
