When did evolution take place?

Proponents of evolution defend their view of the history of life with a great deal of scientific evidence. The observed evolution of bacteria, the results of biogeographical studies and radiometric dating, the existence of botched or unnecessary organs, the presence of evil in nature, etc. Opponents of evolution dispute this evidence and further argue for the invalidity of evolution by citing, for example, the absence of fossil transitional forms or the altruistic behaviour of many animals. The author of this book is convinced that there are fundamental contradictions and shortcomings in the arguments of both camps, the evolutionist and the creationist. With this book, he aims to reveal them to you and to interpret the evidence presented correctly.

The author has a university degree in analytical chemistry. If you think that an analytical chemist should be analysing the contents of test tubes rather than arguing about evolutionary theory, it might be noted that analytical chemists tend to be very precise and detail-oriented by nature, and are often bothered by an inaccuracy of even a ten-thousandth of a per cent in a test tube. What many evolutionists and creationists claim about evolution contains significantly greater inaccuracies and logical fallacies. After reading this book, they will no longer have a chance to lead you by the nose.